Abstract
The aim of this systematic review is to examine the relationship between anogenital distance (AGD) and prenatal androgen exposure in female offspring, and to assess whether there is sufficient scientific evidence that AGD could be a biomarker of in utero exposure in girls. A systematic approach was adopted to the screening and selection of the studies through Pub Med database. 959 documents were found in Pub Med search, 919 of them were excluded for lack of relevance, and 40 studies were included in the review. A significant portion of the selected studies (25 papers) focuses on the effect of exposure to endocrine disrupting agents (EDAs) such as phthalates, bisphenol A, and perfluoroalkyl substances. The other exposure factors examined in the studies are polycystic ovary syndrome, smoking and alcohol use, and maternal stressful life events. In 19 studies, a significant association has been reported between prenatal exposure factors and AGD length in female fetus and newborns. In the remaining 21 studies, no significant association was found. In conclusion, although there is still no a clear and conclusive evidence, a growing body of research provides data supporting that AGD may be considered a reliable marker of in utero androgen exposure in female infants. Our review highlights significant knowledge gaps with regard to some androgen or anti-androgen exposure factors. Much more research needed to understand the relationship of anogenital distance with in utero hormonal milieu and offspring’s reproductive system development.
References
(1) Schwartz CL, Christiansen S, Vinggaard AM, Axelstad M, Hass U, Svingen T. Anogenital distance as a toxicological or clinical marker for fetal androgen action and risk for reproductive disorders. Arch Toxicol. 2019;93(2):253-272. doi:10.1007/s00204-018-2350-5
(2) Hakim C, Padmanabhan V, Vyas AK. Gestational Hyperandrogenism in Developmental Programming. Endocrinology. 2017;158(2):199-212. doi:10.1210/en.2016-1801
(3) Welsh M, Suzuki H, Yamada G. The masculinization programming window. Endocr Dev. 2014;27:17-27. doi:10.1159/000363609
(4) Jain VG, Goyal V, Chowdhary V, et al. Anogenital distance is determined during early gestation in humans. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(9):1619-1627. doi:10.1093/humrep/dey265
(5) Gore AC, Chappell VA, Fenton SE, et al. EDC-2: The Endocrine Society's Second Scientific Statement on Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals. Endocr Rev. 2015;36(6):E1-E150. doi:10.1210/er.2015-1010
(6) Fowler PA, Filis P, Bhattacharya S, et al. Human anogenital distance: an update on fetal smoke-exposure and integration of the perinatal literature on sex differences. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(2):463-472. doi:10.1093/humrep/dev323
(7) Thankamony A, Pasterski V, Ong KK, Acerini CL, Hughes IA. Anogenital distance as a marker of androgen exposure in humans. Andrology. 2016;4(4):616-625. doi:10.1111/andr.12156
(8) Skakkebaek NE, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Main KM. Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: an increasingly common developmental disorder with environmental aspects. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(5):972-978. doi:10.1093/humrep/16.5.972
(9) Filippou P, Homburg R. Is foetal hyperexposure to androgens a cause of PCOS?. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(4):421-432. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmx013
(10) Servin A, Nordenström A, Larsson A, Bohlin G. Prenatal androgens and gender-typed behavior: a study of girls with mild and severe forms of congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Dev Psychol. 2003;39(3):440-450. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.3.440
(11) Barrett ES, Parlett LE, Sathyanarayana S, et al. Prenatal exposure to stressful life events is associated with masculinized anogenital distance (AGD) in female infants. Physiol Behav. 2013;114-115:14-20. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.03.004
(12) Nelson W, Liu DY, Yang Y, Zhong ZH, Wang YX, Ding YB. In utero exposure to persistent and nonpersistent endocrine-disrupting chemicals and anogenital distance. A systematic review of epidemiological studies†. Biol Reprod. 2020;102(2):276-291. doi:10.1093/biolre/ioz200
(13) Swan SH, Sathyanarayana S, Barrett ES, et al. First trimester phthalate exposure and anogenital distance in newborns. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(4):963-972. doi:10.1093/humrep/deu363
(14) Fisher BG, Thankamony A, Hughes IA, Ong KK, Dunger DB, Acerini CL. Prenatal paracetamol exposure is associated with shorter anogenital distance in male infants. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(11):2642-2650. doi:10.1093/humrep/dew196
(15) Loreto-Gómez C, Farías P, Moreno-Macías H, Guzmán C, Riojas-Rodríguez H. Prenatal exposure to persistent organic compounds and their association with anogenital distance in infants. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;37(6):732-740. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.09.008
(16) Dean A, Sharpe RM. Clinical review: Anogenital distance or digit length ratio as measures of fetal androgen exposure: relationship to male reproductive development and its disorders. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(6):2230-2238. doi:10.1210/jc.2012-4057
(17) Qian Y, Shao H, Ying X, Huang W, Hua Y. The Endocrine Disruption of Prenatal Phthalate Exposure in Mother and Offspring. Front Public Health. 2020;8:366. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00366
(18) Wenzel AG, Bloom MS, Butts CD, et al. Influence of race on prenatal phthalate exposure and anogenital measurements among boys and girls. Environ Int. 2018;110:61-70. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2017.10.007
(19) Huang PC, Kuo PL, Chou YY, Lin SJ, Lee CC. Association between prenatal exposure to phthalates and the health of newborns. Environ Int. 2009;35(1):14-20. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2008.05.012
(20) Adibi JJ, Lee MK, Naimi AI, et al. Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Partially Mediates Phthalate Association With Male and Female Anogenital Distance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(9):E1216-E1224. doi:10.1210/jc.2015-2370
(21) Barrett ES, Parlett LE, Sathyanarayana S, Redmon JB, Nguyen RH, Swan SH. Prenatal Stress as a Modifier of Associations between Phthalate Exposure and Reproductive Development: results from a Multicentre Pregnancy Cohort Study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2016;30(2):105-114. doi:10.1111/ppe.12264
(22) Arbuckle TE, Agarwal A, MacPherson SH, et al. Prenatal exposure to phthalates and phenols and infant endocrine-sensitive outcomes: The MIREC study. Environ Int. 2018;120:572-583. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2018.08.034
(23) Zarean M, Keikha M, Feizi A, Kazemitabaee M, Kelishadi R. The role of exposure to phthalates in variations of anogenital distance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Pollut. 2019;247:172-179. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.026
(24) Li J, Yang L, He G, et al. Association between prenatal exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances and anogenital distance in female neonates. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022;245:114130. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.114130
(25) Lind DV, Priskorn L, Lassen TH, et al. Prenatal exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances and anogenital distance at 3 months of age as marker of endocrine disruption [published online ahead of print, 2016 Jul 12]. Reprod Toxicol. 2016;S0890-6238(16)30265-9. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2016.07.008
(26) Arbuckle TE, MacPherson S, Foster WG, et al. Prenatal perfluoroalkyl substances and newborn anogenital distance in a Canadian cohort. Reprod Toxicol. 2020;94:31-39. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2020.03.011
(27) Christensen JVR, Bangash KK, Weihe P, et al. Maternal exposure to perfluoroalkyl chemicals and anogenital distance in the offspring: A Faroese cohort study. Reprod Toxicol. 2021;104:52-57. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2021.06.016
(28) Barrett ES, Sathyanarayana S, Mbowe O, et al. First-Trimester Urinary Bisphenol A Concentration in Relation to Anogenital Distance, an Androgen-Sensitive Measure of Reproductive Development, in Infant Girls. Environ Health Perspect. 2017;125(7):077008. Published 2017 Jul 11. doi:10.1289/EHP875
(29) Mammadov E, Uncu M, Dalkan C. High Prenatal Exposure to Bisphenol A Reduces Anogenital Distance in Healthy Male Newborns. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2018;10(1):25-29. doi:10.4274/jcrpe.4817
(30) Sun X, Li D, Liang H, et al. Maternal exposure to bisphenol A and anogenital distance throughout infancy: A longitudinal study from Shanghai, China. Environ Int. 2018;121(Pt 1):269-275. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2018.08.055
(31) Sun X, Liu C, Wang Z, et al. Prenatal exposure to residential PM2.5 and anogenital distance in infants at birth: A birth cohort study from Shanghai, China. Environ Pollut. 2020;264:114684. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114684
(32) Shen X, Meng X, Wang C, et al. Prenatal exposure to fine particulate matter and newborn anogenital distance: a prospective cohort study. Environ Health. 2023;22(1):16. Published 2023 Feb 9. doi:10.1186/s12940-023-00969-w
(33) Luan M, Ji H, Miao M, et al. Association between prenatal exposure to polybrominated diphenyl ethers and anogenital distance in girls at ages 0-4 years. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2021;233:113706. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2021.113706
(34) Jensen TK, Andersson AM, Main KM, et al. Prenatal paraben exposure and anogenital distance and reproductive hormones during mini-puberty: A study from the Odense Child Cohort. Sci Total Environ. 2021;769:145119. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145119
(35) Vafeiadi M, Agramunt S, Papadopoulou E, et al. In utero exposure to dioxins and dioxin-like compounds and anogenital distance in newborns and infants. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121(1):125-130. doi:10.1289/ehp.1205221
(36) Bornman MS, Chevrier J, Rauch S, et al. Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane exposure and anogenital distance in the Venda Health Examination of Mothers, Babies and their Environment (VHEMBE) birth cohort study, South Africa. Andrology. 2016;4(4):608-615. doi:10.1111/andr.12235
(37) Torres-Sanchez L, Zepeda M, Cebrián ME, et al. Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene exposure during the first trimester of pregnancy alters the anal position in male infants. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1140:155-162. doi:10.1196/annals.1454.004
(38) Lassen TH, Frederiksen H, Kyhl HB, et al. Prenatal Triclosan Exposure and Anthropometric Measures Including Anogenital Distance in Danish Infants. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124(8):1261-1268. doi:10.1289/ehp.1409637
(39) Dalsager L, Christensen LE, Kongsholm MG, et al. Associations of maternal exposure to organophosphate and pyrethroid insecticides and the herbicide 2,4-D with birth outcomes and anogenital distance at 3 months in the Odense Child Cohort. Reprod Toxicol. 2018;76:53-62. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2017.12.008
(40) Loreto-Gómez C, Farías P, Moreno-Macías H, Guzmán C, Riojas-Rodríguez H. Prenatal exposure to persistent organic compounds and their association with anogenital distance in infants. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;37(6):732-740. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.09.008
(41) Sheinberg R, Siegel EL, Keidar R, et al. Associations between intrauterine exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls on neonatal ano-genital distance. Reprod Toxicol. 2020;96:67-75. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2020.06.005
(42) Lesseur C, Pirrotte P, Pathak KV, et al. Maternal urinary levels of glyphosate during pregnancy and anogenital distance in newborns in a US multicenter pregnancy cohort. Environ Pollut. 2021;280:117002. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117002
(43) Pan Z, Zhu F, Zhou K. A Systematic Review of Anogenital Distance and Gynecological Disorders: Endometriosis and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:696879. Published 2021 Jul 22. doi:10.3389/fendo.2021.696879
(44) Barrett ES, Hoeger KM, Sathyanarayana S, et al. Anogenital distance in newborn daughters of women with polycystic ovary syndrome indicates fetal testosterone exposure. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2018;9(3):307-314. doi:10.1017/S2040174417001118
(45) Perlman S, Toledano Y, Kivilevitch Z, Halevy N, Rubin E, Gilboa Y. Foetal Sonographic Anogenital Distance Is Longer in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Mothers. J Clin Med. 2020;9(9):2863. Published 2020 Sep 4. doi:10.3390/jcm9092863
(46) Glintborg D, Jensen RC, Schmedes AV, et al. Anogenital distance in children born of mothers with polycystic ovary syndrome: the Odense Child Cohort [published correction appears in Hum Reprod. 2020 Jan 1;35(1):254]. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(10):2061-2070. doi:10.1093/humrep/dez122
(47) Kareem AJ, Owa JA, Elusiyan JBE. Estimations of total serum testosterone levels in Nigerian term neonates at birth using anogenital distance measurements. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2020;33(5):631-638. doi:10.1515/jpem-2019-0516
(48) Kızılay DÖ, Aydın C, Aygün AP, Tuhan HÜ, Olukman Ö. Prenatal smoke exposure is associated with increased anogenital distance in female infants: a prospective case-control study. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2020;34(1):79-88. Published 2020 Oct 9. doi:10.1515/jpem-2020-0363
(49) Toriola AT, Vääräsmäki M, Lehtinen M, et al. Determinants of maternal sex steroids during the first half of pregnancy [published correction appears in Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jan;119(1):186-7]. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(5):1029-1036. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182342b7f
(50) Xia R, Jin L, Li D, et al. Association Between Paternal Alcohol Consumption Before Conception and Anogenital Distance of Offspring. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018;42(4):735-742. doi:10.1111/acer.13595
(51) Arbuckle TE, MacPherson S, Barrett E, et al. Do stressful life events during pregnancy modify associations between phthalates and anogenital distance in newborns?. Environ Res. 2019;177:108593. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2019.108593
(52) Barrett ES, Parlett LE, Redmon JB, Swan SH. Evidence for sexually dimorphic associations between maternal characteristics and anogenital distance, a marker of reproductive development. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179(1):57-66. doi:10.1093/aje/kwt220
(53) Singal AK, Jain VG. Maternal and infant characteristics influencing the anogenital distance and penile length in newborns. Andrologia. 2016;48(6):708-713. doi:10.1111/and.12507
(54) Wang Z, Niu J, Ji H, et al. Association of pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with neonatal anogenital distance in a Chinese birth cohort. Reprod Health. 2022;19(1):152. Published 2022 Jun 29. doi:10.1186/s12978-022-01458-y
(55) Papadopoulou E, Vafeiadi M, Agramunt S, et al. Maternal diet, prenatal exposure to dioxins and other persistent organic pollutants and anogenital distance in children. Sci Total Environ. 2013;461-462:222-229. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.005
(56) Ercin S, Ertas S, Dundar O, Oktem O, Yakin K. Anogenital distance in newborn infants conceived by assisted reproduction and natural conception. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;41(3):474-482. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.04.019
(57) Vieiralves RR, Ribeiro GS Jr, Alves EF, Sampaio FJ, Favorito LA. Are anogenital distance and external female genitalia development changed in neural tube defects? Study in human fetuses. J Pediatr Urol. 2020;16(5):654.e1-654.e8. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.07.015

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Filiz Halıcı Öztürk, Ayşegül Atalay