Abstract
Objectives: The study aimed to assess the natural skin color and striae (stretch marks) characteristics in pregnant women and to explore their association with the presence and severity of intraperitoneal adhesions (IPA) during repeat cesarean deliveries.
Materials and Methods: Three hundred eighty-nine pregnant women were included in the study. Before the operation, patients’ natural skin color, and the presence and localization of striae were recorded. During the cesarean section, adhesions were scored according to the clinical adhesion scoring system.
Results: There was no significant relation between natural skin color and adhesion severity. Striae characteristics were not related to adhesion severity. However, the severity of striae above the umbilicus is an important marker for the prediction of IPA.
Conclusions: This study indicates that while natural skin color and overall striae characteristics do not predict adhesion severity, severe striae located above the umbilicus can be an effective preoperative indicator for intraperitoneal adhesions in repeat cesarean patients.
References
(1) Antoine C, Young BK. Cesarean section one hundred years 1920–2020: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 2021; 49:5-16.
(2) Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, Mola G, Visser GH, Homer CS, et al. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. The Lancet. 2018; 392:1349-1357.
(3) Phipps MG, Watabe B, Clemons JL, Weitzen S, Myers DL. Risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105: 156-160.
(4) Morales KJ, Gordon MC, Bates GW Jr. Postcesarean delivery adhesions associated with delayed delivery of infant. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196: 461-466
(5) Nisenblat V, Barak S, Griness OB, Degani S, Ohel G, Gonen R. Maternal complications associated with multiple Cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 21-26.
(6) Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat Cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 1226-1232.
(7) Tulandi T, Agdi M, Zarei A, Miner L, Sikirica V. Adhesion formation and morbidity after repeat Cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 201: 1-6.
(8) Köşüş N, Kamalak Z, Köşüş A. Previous Cesarean Scar Characteristics May Predict Severity of Intraperitoneal Adhesions: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study. Advanced Research in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2024; 2 :1.
(9) Gao FL, Jin R, Zhang L, Zhang YG. The contribution of melanocytes to pathological scar formation during wound healing. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2013; 6: 609‐613.
(10) Atwal GS, Manku LK, Griffiths CE et al. Striae gravidarum in primiparae. Br J Dermatol 2006; 155: 965-969.
(11) Wong RC, Ellis CN. Physiologic skin changes in pregnancy. J Am Acad Dermatol 1984; 10: 929-940.
Thomas RGR, Liston WA. Clinical association of striae gravidarum. J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 270-271
(13) Watson RE, Parry EJ, Humphries JD, Jones CJ, Polson DW, Kielty CM, et al. Fibrillin microfibrils are reduced in skin exhibiting striae distensae. Br J Dermatol 1998; 138: 931-937.
(14) Sachdeva S. Fitzpatrick skin typing: Applications in dermatology. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2009; 75: 93-96.
(15) Linsky CB, Diamond MP, Cunningham T, Constantine B, DeCherney AH, diZerega GS. Adhesion reduction in the rabbit uterine horn model using an absorbable barrier, TC-7. J Reprod Med. 1987; 32: 17-20.
(16) Ketchum LD, Cohen IK, Masters FW. Hypertrophic scars and keloids. A collective review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1974; 53: 140-154.
(17) Cheong YC, Laird SM, Li TC, Shelton JB, Ledger WL, Cooke ID. Peritoneal healing and adhesion formation/reformation. Hum Reprod Update. 2001; 7: 556-566.
(18) Arung W, Meurisse M, Detry O. Pathophysiology and prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions. World J Gastroenterol. 2011; 17: 4545-4553
(19) Zhang LX, Guo SZ, Wang Z. Biological effects of supernatant from melanocytes culture on proliferation of hypertrophic scar fibroblasts. J Fourth Mil Med Univ. 2000; 21: 669-670.
(20) Wong RC, Ellis CN. Physiologic skin changes in pregnancy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1984; 10: 929-940.
(21) Farahnik B, Park K, Kroumpouzos G, Murase J. Striae gravidarum: Risk factors, prevention, and management. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2017; 3: 77-85.
(22) Xu X, Rivkind A, Pappo O, Pikarsky A, Levi-Schaffer F. Role of mast cells and myofibroblasts in human peritoneal adhesion formation. Ann Surg. 2002; 236: 593-60.
(23) Cakir Gungor AN, Oguz S, Hacivelioglu S, Isik S, Uysal A, Gencer M, et al. Predictive value of striae gravidarum severity for intraperitoneal adhesions or uterine scar healing in patients with previous caesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014; 27:1312-1315.
(24) Dogan A, Ertas IE, Uyar I, Karaca I, Bozgeyik B, Töz E, Ozeren M. Preoperative Association of Abdominal Striae Gravidarum with Intraabdominal Adhesions in Pregnant Women with a History of Previous Cesarean Section: a Cross-sectional Study. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016; 76: 268-272
(25) Celik EY, Ersoy AO, Ersoy E, Yoruk O, Tokmak A, Tasci Y. Is Striae Gravidarum related to Cesarean Scar and Peritoneal Adhesions? Pak J Med Sci. 2018; 34: 568‐573.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Zeynep Kamalak, Nermin Köşüş, Aydın Köşüş